Land Owners Win Right to Challenge Feds Over Control of Private Property

1835 Original Seal for MichiganLand Owners WIN RIGHT to Challenge Reds Over Control of Private Property
When 56 men placed their lives on the line when they signed the Declaration of Independence, they did so with the intent of providing Americans the rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Also among those rights was the right to own and control property.

Under a socialist government, few people have the right to own and control property. The government assumes ownership and control of private property, depriving the people of the rights that we value here in the United States.

However, as our government has started adopting socialistic agendas, they have followed the patterns of other socialist nations. One of those patterns is taking control of private property by means of the Environmental Protections Agency (EPA) and the Army Corps of Engineers.

In 2012, I wrote about how the Army Corp of Engineers sought to control 20 acres of privately owned desert land by deeming a dry desert wash as a waterway of the United States of America. Peter and Frankie Smith from the Santa Fe, New Mexico area took the Army Corps of Engineers to court over the issue.

Continue reading

Declaration of Grievances

1835 Original Seal for Michigan

The Most Dangerous Force on Earth is
 100 Million Armed Americans with Nothing Left to Lose!



(An Ultimate Line in the Sand)

All Federal, State, and Local Elected
and Appointed Officials and Employees;
All Public and Private Media Outlets
WE THE PEOPLE, the Free Citizens of these United States, of the Several Sovereign States, and of the Counties, Cities, and Towns in those states;
Notice of Non-Compliance, Declarations and States of War, and
Citizen’s “Rules Engagement.”
WE THE PEOPLE, the citizens of these United States of America, individually and collectively, hereby proclaim certain specified and unspecified usurpation’s, laws, regulations, policies, practices and actions of elected, and non-elected public servants and employees are unconstitutional, unlawful abuses and excesses of power, control, and manipulation, often to the detriment, safety and security of citizens, and without just cause or legitimate, lawful authority; and that such violations will no longer tolerated.
Henceforth, any and all violations of the Constitution of the United States of America as written, amended, and ratified by the several states, by any public servant, whether elected, appointed, or employed by federal, state, or local government shall be deemed to be unlawful acts and as such shall be prosecuted and tried in appropriate judicial jurisdictions.
To Wit:
Any and all violations of the Constitution of the United States of America through and by legislative action, collusion, coordination, cooperation, financing, monetary management or assistance, or other mutually beneficial legislation, actions, contracts, or agreements;
Any and all laws, mandates, legal requirements, codes, and penalties enforced against any public or private commercial entity or enterprise that causes or forces said entities or enterprises to violate in actuality or in effect the Constitution of the United States of America;
Any Executive Action or Order, either at the federal or state level, that forces any and all political appointees, staff, or employees to violate the Constitution of the United States of America or act in such a manner that the constitutionally protected, God-given, natural human rights of the citizens of the United States of America are violated or denied, or that puts the safety, security, and lives of said citizens in possible or imminent danger and jeopardy.
WE THE PEOPLE, the citizens of these United States of America, after countless and repeated offenses and violations of our rights, both individually and collectively, as guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States of America
We will no longer comply with any law, Executive Order, regulation, code, treaty, or other mandate that violates our constitutional rights, forces us to violate the constitutional rights of our fellow citizens, or puts our lives and well-bring in jeopardy or imminent danger, or violates and invades our privacy or property without a warrant issued by impartial judicial authority.
We will, when aforementioned violations and actions are attempted with, and by, the use of armed force or aggression, oppose and deny said force and aggression with armed response, as is our right and duty under the Constitution of the United States of America.
Any action or attempted action by any government entity to use any armed aggressor force or any armed military unit(s), whether foreign or domestic, to control or force compliance of American citizens, will be met with armed resistance. Any and all such actions WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ACT OF WAR AGAINST THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, AND A STATE OF WAR SHALL EXIST;
Any action or attempted action by any government entity to declare a general state of “Martial Law” without due process and lawful justification, or without a clear failure of state or local government to fulfill their function to protect the citizens, WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ACT OF WAR AGAINST THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND A STATE OF WAR SHALL EXIST;
Any action or attempted action by any government entity, whether by legislation or Executive Order, to “Suspend the Constitution of the United States of America” SHALL BE CONSIDERED AN ACT OF WAR AGAINST THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND A STATE OF WAR SHALL EXIST;
Any action or attempted action by any government entity, whether by legislation or Executive Order, to specifically disarm, deny, confiscate, or otherwise violate the right of citizens to keep and bear arms, as guaranteed by the Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, SHALL BE CONSIDERED AN ACT OF WAR AGAINST THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND A STATE OF WAR SHALL EXIST;
Any action or attempted action by any government entity, whether by legislation or Executive Order, to arrest, detain, or hold beyond a lawful period, without warrant, due process, or probable cause and without access to or representation of legal counsel, for any reason, any citizen or group of citizens, in any jail, prison, work camp or facility, or detention center or camp, without the express permission or request of the citizens, SHALL B E CONSIDERED AN ACT OF WAR AGAINST THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND A STATE OF WAR SHALL EXIST.
American Citizens’ Rules of Armed Engagement
If representatives of a government agency, or members of an armed force, come to you or otherwise engages in any activity that denies or deprives you of your constitutionally protected, God-given natural human rights, and does so with violence or the threat of violence, and further, does so without a warrant issued upon presentation of probable cause by lawful judicial authority, armed resistance and engagement is authorized.
When, due to an unprovoked assault upon your person that puts your life in immediate jeopardy or has the potential to inflict great and serious bodily harm, armed resistance and the use of deadly force is authorized.
When, due to an unprovoked assault upon other persons that puts their lives in immediate jeopardy or has the potential to inflict great and serious bodily harm, armed resistance and the use of deadly force is authorized.

Date___________ Location­___________________

Note from the author
Please do not erroneously label the foregoing document as a threat; it is not. It is a “line in the sand” that, hopefully, will be understood by all for precisely what it is. The widest possible distribution of this document is authorized, including personal and mass emails, with specific emphasis to all government personnel and agencies at all levels and functions, citizens’ organizations, and the entire spectrum of media outlets and Internet sites including Face Book, Twitter, You Tube and other social media.
Douglas Lamb
Patriot Militia Call Sign FIREHAWK
Director, WRAM
Welcome to the WRAM Action Center
Below is information every Militia Member and Patriot Soldier MUST know. Some entries are long, some are short, but ALL are important in the coming fight for our return to freedom!
I recommend checking these sites daily!

Continue reading

Republicans are in control now


Prior to the 2014 elections, Republicans were hamstrung by a Democrat
controlled White House and Senate. The 2014 elections changed that dynamic.
As of January 2015, Republicans are in charge…

The House – 249 Republicans to 186 Democrats          57%
The Senate – 54 Republicans to 44 Democrats             55%
State Governors – 32 Republicans to 17 Democrats      65%
State Legislatures – 68 Republican to 30 Democrat       69%
Full State Control – 23 Republican to 7 Democrat          58%

This means that as of January 2015, Republicans can no longer blame Obama or
his Democrats for what is happening in our country. Because Republicans have
all the necessary power to stop Obama’s democratic destruction of our
Constitutional Republic at both the federal and state levels, Republicans
are now 100% responsible for everything that happens next in America

By J.B. Williams
November 18, 2014

Stewart Rhodes Oath Keepers Ask Police To Do What Is Right

Published on Dec 15, 2014

Stewart Rhodes of Oath Keepers “Lighting the Lamp of Liberty” event in Washington D.C. 11/17/2014 warns of rogue individuals in government abusing their power. He also asks sheriffs and peace officers to stand against the tyranny and abuse of individuals rights. He talks about Bundy Ranch and how bloodshed was closer than most realized. He also warns that the possibility of civil war is real.

View more videos at: WWW.CSPOA.ORG

Well-Known TV Veterinarian Faces Pending Disciplinary Action

“I think the situation’s wrong. I’ve always had great care from him.”
A well-known television veterinarian, under fire. Another vet is accusing him of not following regulations while treating this dog. The “Incredible Dr. Pol” is well-known for working with pets and their owners to find inexpensive ways to heal them. His efforts inspired a series on Nat Geo WILD. One of the episodes started a controversy with a vet from out of state.
Dr. Pol works at his practice in Isabella County’s Weidman Township.

9&10’s Cody Boyer and photojournalist Jacob Johnson visited the clinic today and have more details on the accusations.

Continue reading

Blaine Cooper Addresses John McCain at Town Hall Meeting

1835 Original Seal for MichiganI don’t believe that John McClain has maintained his office in AZ by an honest election.  I believe this is another case of “rigged voting”.  Listen to what he said just before Blaine started speaking.  This man is extremely arrogant, and what he says at the end telling Blaine to “run for office” and gloating about doing 8 terms himself…well…voter rigging and money will put into in office.  This is an old video from 2013 but I’m posting it to show the disdain McClain revealed at the town hall meeting. One thing that Blaine did at the 2:22 mark is he stated, “If I were in a position of power or authority I’d have you arrested….”  well, this is a defeatist statement and continues to esteem them.  We…the people do have the POWER but not approaching them!  The people need to reach out to the people and get more people to attend the meetings and to take back their voting ballots!  As long as we continue to try to topple the top we’ll not succeed but if we knock their feet out from under them at the local level in our communities we might, Lord willing, have a chance.  Once the communities are reunited then you take your state back.  Peaceful revolution happens without notice and they can’t stop it.

Published on Oct 22, 2013

Senator John McCain (R-AZ) has come under attack, and rightfully so. He has gone from being a Vietnam Veteran hero to crossing the line, in my opinion and many others, of being a traitor to the Constitution and the United States. I ran across a video of a townhall meeting that apparently took place sometime in September, in which Blaine Cooper called out John McCain on his treason for aiding and abetting the enemy of the United States. Read More at…

Manistique Paper Mill Possibly Closing

MANISTIQUE — Manistique Papers maybe closing for good next week.

UPDATE:  It is closing

According to a source, who wishes to remain anonymous, there was a meeting at the mill Monday discussing possibly shutting down the mill. The mill could be closed as early as Tuesday next week. In the meeting workers were told that the mill would run through its waste paper and start cleaning up.The mill was bought by Watermill Group of Lexington, Massachusetts back in 2012, after the original owners went bankrupt.  The mill is currently up for sale according to our source.  We will continue to look into the situation and will provide you with more information has it happens.  Source LINK


Escanaba Planners Consider Meijer Site Plan Tomorrow


A public hearing on a site plan for a Meijer store and gasoline station at 505 North 26th Street will be conducted tomorrow night, March 18th, by the Escanaba Planning Commission.

The meeting will get underway at 6 pm at the Bonifas Civic Center. Meijer is proposing a 208,447 square foot main retail and grocery center with a gas station supported by a 2,509 square foot retail building. They are expected to rise on a 48 acre site.

The streets that border the property are 6th Avenue North on the north; North 26th Street on the east, 3rd Avenue North on the south; and North 3rd Avenue on the west. The property is under the control of Marvin R. Pouliot and Frank Stopich.

March 17, 2015


1835 Original Seal for MichiganThis e-mail is only going out to a few folks who might actually read it and share the information about the property rights cause with friends. Our judicial system is constitutionally bankrupt but we must use the system to expose it to everyone who wants to reestablish liberty in America. To have a case heard by the MI Supreme Court you must ask their permission, this process is called LEAVE TO APPEAL!  This LEAVE is not the actual BRIEF that must be filled if you are GRANTED permission to go before the MI Supreme Court it is just to present why you think this case is important and why they should hear your case. There is only about a 5% chance the case they will agree to hear the case and that is ok because this is a step in the overall exposure process. Below is just the introduction to the leave to appeal. Attached is the actual leave that was filed with the court. The attached also have both the opinion of the circuit and appeals courts. I have highlighted a couple statements in the Appeals Court OPINION I think you will find very interesting.

“Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn’t pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same.” –Ronald Reagan


This Constitutional and statutory case against the State could affect hundreds of thousands of acres of private property and property owners within the exterior boundaries of Michigan. Plaintiff’s / Appellant’s sought declaratory relief to prevent defendant Department of Environment Quality (DEQ) from entering the property to inspect for wetlands and to require wetland permit with restriction if State so desired.
The state has properly admitted they do not have any Holds, Liens, Monetary, Proprietary or Contractual interests in the physical Property which the Plaintiffs / Appellants is the Assign and holds fee simple patent with no reservation, as evidenced by chain of title. However, the state and lower courts claims PA 451 of 1994, MCL 324.30301 gives jurisdiction over the person and police powers are granted to them by Art. IV § 52 of Michigan Constitution to enter, inspect, and require permits. The Court has also stated this kind of entry and requirement for a permit would not constitute a taking.
The term “property” embodies more than just physical, corporeal assets; it can include intangible entities, such as rights and interests.[1]   The patent 4829 Grants all rights, privileges, immunities, and appurtenances of whatsoever nature, to heirs and assigns forever.” In its precise legal sense, property is nothing more than a collection of rights;[2] indeed, “property,” in law, is not the material object itself, but is the right and interest or domination rightfully obtained over such object, with the unrestricted right to its use, enjoyment, and disposition.[3] The right to exclude others, as well as their property, is one of the most essential sticks in the bundle of rights that are commonly characterized as property. [4] Our case was brought to defend the right to exclude other from the property, to retain control of resources and defend the right not to have to enter into any permitting scheme (contract) with the state for rights already secured.
Art. I § 14 Jury trials “The right of trial by jury shall remain, but shall be waived in all civil cases unless demanded by one of the parties in the manner prescribed by law.  So far, this case has been bantered around on the states home court by trustees and actors of the state, and now needs to be addressed by a jury, the ones who authorize the state to exist, and the ones whose properties are at risk.
The Declaration of Independence clearly states:
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,…”

Continue reading